Relationships
Between Muslims and non-Muslims
The
first thing we looked at was our relationship between Muslims
in these lands living together. The second thing we have to
look at is the relationship that we have with non-Muslims. Now,
an issue that we must look at is that of the abode: the daar.
Although there may be some people who are educated in Islam
who are aware of this issue of the abode, there are many people
who are unaware of this issue. In fact, you will even find some
people who are fuqaha, scholars of Islamic law and the legal
system, who are unaware of this issue. The issue of the abode
is this: most people think that the world is divided into two
abodes, the abode of peace and the abode of war. The abode of
peace is the land of the Muslims, daar al-Islam, and the abode
of war is everywhere else. In Nixon's book that I read a translated
version of called Seizing the Moment, Nixon wrote a long chapter
on the Islamic phenomenon of the modern world. One of the things
Nixon said after praising Islam a great deal and saying many
nice things about Islam is that one of the most fundamental
problems with the Muslims is that they view the world as a dichotomy
of two abodes: the abode of peace and the abode of war. So,
the central aspect of international relationships with the Muslims
is aggression; it is one of war. This idea is wrong. There are
three abodes: there is the abode of peace, the abode of war,
and then there is the abode of treaty where there is a contractual
agreement between two abodes.
For
instance, when I came into this country, they issued me a visa,
and I signed something. In the issuance of the visa and my signing
of it, a legally binding contract occurred which was a sulih.
It was an agreement that when I came into this country, I would
obey the laws and would follow the restrictions that this visa
demanded that I follow. This was a contractual agreement that
is legally binding according even to the divine laws. In looking
at this, we have to understand that the relationship between
the Muslims living in this land and the dominant authorities
in this land is a relationship of peace and contractual agreement-of
a treaty. This is a relationship of dialogue and a relationship
of giving and taking.
We
should remember that when the Messenger of Allah, sallallaahu
'alayhi wa sallam, was in Makkah, what he asked for from the
Quraish was just that they left him alone to do his da'wa. He
said, "Khalu bayni wa baynan naas: Leave me alone to talk to
these people. Let me speak to them; let me call them." And they
wouldn't let him do that. However, in this country, the ruling
people are allowing you to call people to Islam, and this is
exactly what the Messenger of Allah, sallallaahu 'alayhi wa
sallam, was asking that they allow him to do in Makkah. These
people here are allowing you to call people to Islam. They are
not prohibiting you. If you go out and proselytize, they don't
come and arrest you; they don't punish you; they don't torture
you. This idea here should be understood, and the verse from
the Quran that we should take as the overriding verse in our
relationship with this people is where Allah subhaana wa ta'aala
says concerning those who neither fight you because of your
religion nor remove you from your homes that He does not prohibit
you from showing them birr: righteousness. "Birr" in the Arabic
language is the highest degree of ihsaan-it is the 'aala daraja
of ihsan. Allah does not prevent you from showing them excellence-moral
excellence-in your transactions with them nor from sharing with
them a portion of your wealth.