8.
Imam Shams Ul-Din bin Naser Al-Dumashqi (radi Allahu anhu),
said in his book "The Spring for the Thirsty One on the Birth
of the Rightly Guided" about the story of Abu Lahab that he
will receive a light punishment every Monday for expressing
joy at the birth of the Noble Prophet (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam)
on that day. The Imam said the following verse of poetry, the
translation of the above is:
If such Kafir was denounced in the (Qur'an)
And
perished are his hands, and in the Flames is his eternal abode
It is narrated that every Monday
His torment is made easy for his Joy at the Birth of Ahmad
What is the expectation then of a servant who spent all his
life
Happy with the Arrival of Ahmad and died on the Oneness of Allah.
9. Imam Shams Ul-Din Ibn al-Jazri (radi Allahu anhu),
the Imam of Reciters, wrote a book and named it "The Scent of
Notification on the Blessed Birthday".
10.
Imam Al-Hafiz Ibn Al-Jawzi (radi Allahu anhu), said in the description
of Meelad: "Peace and Tranquillity takes over during that year
and a good glad tiding to obtain your wish and inspiration".
11.
Imam Abu-Shamah, The Sheik of Al Hafiz Al Nawawi (radi Allahu
anhuma), said: "The best of the innovations of our times is
what is carried out on the day of corresponding to the birthday
of our Beloved Prophet (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam), where
people give out donations, practice what is right, express their
joy and happiness, in doing so is surely a sign of love and
admiration for the Prophet (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam)".
12.
Imam Al-Hafiz Al-Qastalani (radi Allahu anhu), who gave commentary
on Sahih Bukhari, said: "May Allah shower his Mercy upon a person
who takes the days of the month of Rabbi-ul-Awwal, in which
the Noble Prophet (radi Allahu anhu) was born, as days of feast
and celebration for doing so is the best cure for the heart
of an ailing person."
Following
all of the above, there is yet another false accusation, i.e.
THOSE WHO OPPOSE MEELAD SHAREEF CLAIM THAT IF MEELAD WAS
PART OF "DEEN", THEN SURELY THE PROPHET (SALLAL LAAHU ALAIHI
WASALLAM) WOULD HAVE DONE IT HIMSELF AND HE WOULD HAVE MADE
IT CLEAR FOR THE PEOPLE TO CELEBRATE IT?
THE
REPLY IS:
Not
everything which the Prophet or his Companions did not do would
ultimately make things "Haraam". Since the Prophet (sallal laahu
alaihi wasallam) himself said: "He who introduces a new good
Sunnah in Islam will be rewarded for it ..."
Imam
Shafi'i (radi Allahu anhu) said: "Anything which enjoys the
backing of Shari'ah cannot be an innovation even if the Companions
did not practice it, because their abstention from doing something
may have been due to a particular reason which was there at
that time, or they have left it to something which happens to
be better, or perhaps news about a particular them did not reach
them all".
Therefore,
whosoever alleges that this thing is Haraam on the basis that
the Noble Prophet (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) did not practice
it, then surely he has alleged something which has no foundation
or backing in Shari'ah and thus his allegation is refuted and
rejected.